
Advisers prioritised own interests in SMSF setups: ASIC

The prospect of gaining greater investment control over their retirement savings, wider investment choices and potential cost savings for larger balances, has encouraged Australians to establish self-managed super funds (SMSF) in their droves. But while around 600,000 SMSFs now exist across the country a new study suggests that most could be doing investors more harm than good. According to an ASIC review, almost two-thirds of SMSFs established under the recommendations of a financial adviser are not only unsuitable to their needs but also put their retirement savings at risk. Based on 100 financial advice files investigated, ASIC research concludes that 62 failed to demonstrate compliance with the best interests duty, while a quarter of these flagged major concerns about client detriment relating to recommendations to set up an SMSF in the first place.Advisers acted as order takersOn the flipside, only 38% of client files managed to demonstrate compliance with the mandate advisers have to act in clients' best interests. In the instances where clients were given a bum steer, ASIC concluded that advisers had not based all judgements entirely on the circumstances relevant to each individual. This included "inappropriate







